The interior minister issued a rare ministerial directive to address civil servants’ concerns about whether the program would be worth the money. It is only the second ministerial mandate – one mandate imposed by a minister despite the objection of a permanent secretary – received by the Home Office 30 years ago. The first was to speed up the Windrush compensation system before the legislation. Civil servants could stage mass layoffs in protest of the new plans, unions have warned. Britain has promised Rwanda an initial sum of 120 120 million as part of an “economic transformation and integration fund”, but the United Kingdom will also pay for the operating costs. A fixed amount of funding will be available for each migrant, which is expected to cost between .000 20,000 and 30 30,000 per person for the flight to Rwanda and the first three months of stay there. Immigration Minister Tom Persglov said on Friday that he believed the move would save money in Britain in the long run. However, civil servants are against the policy for legal and ethical reasons and are expected to express their disgust for the direction. Dave Penman, the FDA’s secretary general, warned that officials could demand a reshuffle from the Home Office or leave the public service altogether instead of handing over politics. He said: “It is a divisive policy, but civil servants know that their job is to serve the government of the day. With regard to the most divisive policies, the choice of civil servants is to implement them or to leave. This could mean leaving the department elsewhere, leaving another department or leaving the public service. ” The Public Service and Commercial Services (PCS) said that “trying to claim that this is anything but utterly inhumane is pure hypocrisy.” Peer-to-peer human rights lawyers and members of the opposition have also condemned the plan – even arguing that it is unlikely to happen due to judicial review and other judicial action that would challenge the legitimacy of the measures. Shadow Prison Minister Ellie Reeves told Times Radio: “The UN High Commissioner for Refugees [UN refugee agency] “They have really, really strongly condemned the government’s proposals, as have many organizations, and it seems that government officials themselves have expressed huge doubts about the plans, which seem to be completely misplaced.” He said: “We are in the middle of a cost of living crisis, so it does not seem like the right way to spend money on an immoral and unworkable plan that will not prevent people from coming.” On Friday, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) condemned the plan as “a symbolic gesture” that would not be implemented in practice. Despite the backlash, Patel believes other countries will follow the UK’s asylum proposals. He said Denmark could be among those who would replicate the UK “design” system. “There is no doubt now that the model we have presented, I am convinced it is world class and world first, and will be used as a design in the future, there is no doubt about it,” Patel said. “I will not be surprised if other countries start coming directly to us after that as well.”
